Topic:Research proposal assignmentDescription: [?]Preferred language style: English (U.K.)Research proposal assignmentThis assignment involves the production of a research proposal.Reflecting the usual conventions in relation to outline proposals,there will be strict controls on the overall size. The proposal shouldbe no less than 1200 words and no more than 1500 words.No Appendices should be attached. The assignment should be submittedin hard copy and electronically through the Turnitin system. The coverpage should include a word count.TopicThere are certain criteria governing the choice of topic and methodsfor the research proposal.The topic shoulda) be explicitly related to the fields of business, management or public policy;b) lend itself to being investigated using conventional research methodology.The research shouldc) centre around empirical inquiry involving the collection of datafrom individuals;d) be a small-scale study involving minimal resources;e) be conducted personally by the student as the principal researcher;f) be planned for completion within a 6-month time scale.Note 1: This assignment requires no empirical research to be done bystudents. The assignment is a proposal for research, not a report onresearch actually undertaken.Note 2: The criteria for the assignment link closely with requirementsfor the dissertation. However, it is important to recognise that thisis an assignment for the Research Methodology module. Thespecifications for the assignment reflect the content of the courseand, in principle, might differ from the requirements for thedissertation proposal outlined for other purposes elsewhere on thecourse (for instance in relation to the allocation of dissertationsupervisors). Clearly, the intention is that there should be overlapand similarity. However, candidates need to be aware that, as anassignment for the Research Methodology module, an appropriateemphasis needs to be placed upon the methodology behind the datacollection and analysis.SkillsThe assignment calls upon students to demonstrate:? suitable skills in the application of relevant knowledge underpressure of time constraints.? factual knowledge about the strategies and methods available tosocial researchers and their relative strengths and weaknesses.? professional sensitivity to the main ethical, political, legal andresource parameters within which research is conducted.? ability to present a feasible plan of work that meets the researchrequirements outlined in the module.Assessment criteriaThe research proposal will be evaluated according to the following criteria:? research aims have been clearly stated.? key-words adequately reflect the content of the proposed research.? background section shows the value of the research (theory/practice)? research questions/hypotheses precisely identify the issues to beinvestigated.? the research strategy and data collection methods have beendescribed briefly and precisely.? the strategy and data collection methods have been Discuss (check midcourse.net for the help you need)ed interms of their implications and justified with reference toalternative possibilities.? the proposed investigation appears to be feasible within the giventime and resource constraints.? the proposal shows an awareness of the principles of research ethicsand a sensitivity to the political/legal context within which theresearch is to be conducted.? a suitable number of relevant sources have been used to support theDiscuss (check midcourse.net for the help you need)ion.? sources have been cited and referenced properly using the Harvard system.? the proposal acknowledges any limitations inherent in its design.? suitable outcomes from the research have been identified.Reassessment detailsIf work needs to be resubmitted the overall mark for the module willbe capped at 40 per cent.PlagiarismEverything submitted for assessment by an individual student or groupof students must be original work. The De Montfort University handbookGeneral Regulations and Procedures Affecting Students states:The significant use by a student of other people?s work and thesubmission of it as though it were his or her own is regarded asplagiarism. Work which is not undertaken in an Examination room underthe supervision of an invigilator (such as dissertations, essays,project work, experiments, observations, specimen collecting, andother similar work), but which is nevertheless required work formingpart of the degree, diploma or certificate assessment, must be thecandidates own and must not contain any plagiarised material. (?3.1.2).Plagiarism includes:? Copying from another student?s work;? Copying from a text without acknowledgement;? Downloading information and/or text from the internet and using itwithout acknowledgement;? Paraphrasing source material without acknowledgement;? Submitting work which you claim to be your own when it has beenproduced by a group;? Submitting group work without acknowledging all contributors.(Plagiarism and Fabrication of results ? a Guide to the AcademicOffences Regulations, issue 3, September, 1999. De MontfortUniversity)Further information on the significance of plagiarism in relation toacademic work, and guidelines on how to avoid plagiarism, areavailable through the De Montfort University intranet sitehttp://intranet.dmu.ac.uk/business_law/teaching/plagiarism_links.htm76401039files_all.zip557KViewDownloadCategory: Business
Our group of high quality writers are ready to help you with a similar paper within a specified deadline. Just click ORDER NOW and provide us with your assignment details, contact information and make payments. You will get periodic updates on order progress in your email.
USE THE CALCULATOR BELOW TO GET THE QUOTE