N.P. Metcalfe and A.J. Ashworth, in their case commentary, Arson: mens rea ? recklessness whether property destroyed or damaged? (2004) Crim L R 369, analyse and critically evaluate the decisions of the House of Lords in R v G  UKHL 50;  1 A.C. 1034 and R. v Caldwell (James)  A.C. 341.Briefly identify the key arguments advanced in the case commentary and, giving reasons, Discuss (check midcourse.net for the help you need) whether Metcalfe and Ashworth?s critical evaluation of the two decisions is persuasively argued.
Our group of high quality writers are ready to help you with a similar paper within a specified deadline. Just click ORDER NOW and provide us with your assignment details, contact information and make payments. You will get periodic updates on order progress in your email.
USE THE CALCULATOR BELOW TO GET THE QUOTE